ANDREW BURD - 4 yo (2006) Conviction Overturned: Foster Mother-Hannah Overton - Corpus Christi TX

Go down

ANDREW BURD - 4 yo (2006) Conviction Overturned: Foster Mother-Hannah Overton - Corpus Christi TX

Post by TomTerrific0420 on Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:12 pm

Hannah Overton will return to a Corpus Christi courtroom Monday in a bid
to convince a judge that ineffective counsel and withheld evidence led
to her capital murder conviction. Prosecutors aim to show the mother of
five's claims of injustice are unfounded, nothing new and that she's
exactly where she should be — prison.

Overton, 35, was convicted of capital murder in 2007 in connection with
the poisoning death of her foster child, Andrew Burd.

The 13th Court of Appeals denied her appeal, and in 2010 the
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals refused to take up the case.

Overton's San Antonio-based appellate attorney, Cynthia Hujar Orr,
petitioned the state's highest court to reconsider and order a local
judge to have a hearing.
In February, the court granted the request.

On Monday, Nueces County District Judge Jose Longoria will conduct an
evidentiary hearing on the merits of her claims. Longoria won't rule in
the case but will make a recommendation to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Overton's foster child, 4-year-old Andrew Burd, died at a
Corpus Christi hospital in 2006 from elevated sodium levels.

The prosecution has maintained Overton forced large amounts of Cajun seasoning down the boy's throat.

Overton's defense argued at trial that the boy had emotional and
medical problems and would eat odd food, including the salty seasoning.
They also suggested the boy may have suffered from undiagnosed diabetes
or a genetic disorder, claims prosecutors have said were unproven.

When polled by attorneys after the trial, jurors said they convicted
Overton because she failed to act in time to save Andrew. Overton and
her husband, Larry, waited more than 1½ hours to take him to a clinic.

He pleaded no contest in 2008 to the lesser charge of criminally
negligent homicide and received five years deferred adjudication
probation and a $5,000 fine. That type of probation allowed him to avoid
a conviction.

Over the years Overton's supporters have only grown and pressed on
with their efforts to free her. A website,, collects
donations. They sent stacks of letters to Gov. Rick Perry asking for her
pardon. A documentary was made

The case has received national media attention with a report on
"20/20," a January article in Texas Monthly and stories in newspapers
across the country.

Longoria's court staff and Nueces County Courthouse security are
prepared for the crowds of Overton supporters, media and other
spectators. The front row of the courtroom gallery has been reserved
solely for media.

Overton's appeal for an overturned conviction include two key claims:
that her trial attorneys failed to properly represent her and that lead
prosecutor Sandra Eastwood withheld test results that showed low levels
of sodium in the boy's stomach contents.

Eastwood has been subpoenaed to take the stand.

Prosecutors wrote in their response to Overton's claims that the
results were no secret to the defense during the trial and that even if
they had been it wasn't proof of her innocence.
"Overton has raised nothing more than unsubstantiated claims and
bare speculation," according to a prosecution filing.

Prosecutors last week declined to comment about the case. Orr said
Friday that although she's previously made public statements about the
case that she will reserve further comments for the courtroom.
Orr also has argued in appeals that one of the doctors who treated the boy
is willing to recant his trial testimony.

Dr. Alexandre Rotta, a pediatric care specialist at Driscoll
Children's Hospital, testified that if the Overtons would have sought
medical care in a reasonable amount of time then the boy could have been saved.

Another defense argument hinges on a second opinion from a New York
doctor who said the time frame would not have mattered in saving the boy's life.

Prosecutors have countered that Rotta never said his testimony was
inaccurate and that the defense never brought up the other doctor's
claim about the time frame.

The judge will determine at an 8:30 a.m. Monday hearing whether
Eastwood will testify, which will be followed the evidentiary hearing.
Supreme Commander of the Universe With Cape AND Tights AND Fancy Headgear
Supreme Commander of the Universe With Cape AND Tights AND Fancy Headgear

Job/hobbies : Searching for Truth and Justice

Back to top Go down

Re: ANDREW BURD - 4 yo (2006) Conviction Overturned: Foster Mother-Hannah Overton - Corpus Christi TX

Post by mom_in_il on Mon May 11, 2015 1:22 pm

Capital Murder Case Against Hannah Overton Dismissed

THU APRIL 9, 2015 10:48 AM

Nine years after Hannah Overton’s nightmarish journey through the criminal justice system began, it ended just as abruptly, yesterday afternoon, when Nueces County District Attorney Mark Skurka called her attorney, Cynthia Orr, to inform her that he had made a motion to dismiss capital murder charges against her.

As recently as December—when Hannah (above, right) was released from prison after an appellate court overturned her conviction—the DA’s office had vowed to try her again for the 2006 death of four-year-old Andrew Byrd. At her bail hearing shortly before Christmas, prosecutors argued that she posed such a grave risk to her children that she should only be allowed to see them during supervised visits. (The presiding judge did not agree and released her with no such restrictions.) Yet despite prosecutors’ determination this winter to retry Hannah, Skurka explained to Orr yesterday that he decided to dismiss charges after spending the past few months thoroughly reinvestigating the case. It was an astonishing turn of events, given that DAs rarely walk away from cases that their offices have previously won convictions in—even troubled cases that are later overturned by higher courts.

A Corpus Christi homemaker and mother of five, Hannah was convicted of capital murder in 2007 for the death of Andrew, whom she and her husband had been in the process of adopting. The four-year-old died on October 3, 2006, in a rare and mystifying case of salt poisoning, which prosecutors said resulted from Hannah force-feeding him salt as punishment for bad behavior. Yet multiple inconsistencies and errors plagued the state’s case. Evidence strongly suggested Andrew had an undiagnosed eating disorder called “pica,” which is characterized by a desire to consume non-food items and inappropriate substances, like salt. Analysis of the contents of Andrew’s stomach, which was not presented at trial, indicated Andrew likely ingested too much salt on his own earlier in the day that he fell ill. Prosecutors had never been able to establish a plausible motive for why Hannah—who had no criminal record or history of violence—would murder a child. Nor had they been able to show how Hannah, who was six months pregnant and suffering from whiplash at the time of Andrew’s death, had been able to force the boy to consume a lethal 23 teaspoons of salt, as the prosecution suggested. In September 2014, her conviction was overturned by the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Though Hannah was released from prison in December and reunited with her children, the battle appeared to have just begun. Skurka vowed to retry Hannah on capital murder charges and had his prosecutors begin to prepare for trial. “No jury, no trial judge, and no appellate court has ever found that defendant Hannah Overton is not responsible for the death of Andrew Burd,” he told reporters.

Ever since then, Orr has put in long hours working to show the DA’s office that it no longer had a case. In multiple conversations in person and by phone with Skurka and his prosecutors over the past few months, Orr walked them through the complex scientific evidence in the case, explaining how their assumptions had been obliterated during a six-day evidentiary hearing held in 2012. She also showed how many of their witnesses would be willing to testify for the defense if there was to be a retrial. Most significant among them was the state’s star witness, Dr. Alexandre Rotta, who had treated Andrew on the night he was brought to the hospital in a coma in 2006. Orr revealed that Rotta had recently contacted Hannah’s attorneys to say that her conviction still kept him up at night. Orr showed that he, as well as  other key witnesses, could no longer be counted on to uphold the state’s case.

Orr’s diligence paid off. In a statement released late this afternoon, Skurka explained, “As district attorney, I recognize the charges against Mrs. Overton are very serious. Therefore, since the reversal by the Court of Criminal Appeals based on mistakes made by her defense counsel during her first trial, our office has diligently reviewed the facts and circumstances of the case. This decision was a result of a myriad of factors, which came about after a careful review of the previous trial, reinterviewing some of the key witnesses, consulting with some of the medical experts involved in the case, reviewing evidence adduced at recent hearings, and staffing the case with the current prosecutors assigned to the case. After this review, I exercised prosecutor discretion in dismissing the case.”

When I reached Orr last night, she had nothing but praise for Skurka, who was not the DA when Hannah was prosecuted in 2007. “He’s done the right thing, not the easy thing,” she said. “This is Mr. Skurka acting in the best tradition of his profession—pursing justice, not convictions.”

Orr, of the San Antonio lawfirm Goldstein, Goldstein, and Hilley, has worked for six years on Hannah’s behalf. She has been assisted along the way by her colleague Gerry Goldstein, and by the man who won exoneree Michael Morton his freedom, John Raley, of the Houston firm Raley & Bowick.

“Hannah and her family are relieved and overjoyed,” Orr told me of the tearful phone call she shared with her client and her children this afternoon, during which Hannah was overcome by emotion. “They are still traumatized by the loss of Andy, and now they can finally begin to grieve and heal.”

When I spoke to Raley, he put a finer point on the trauma suffered by Hannah and others like her. “Hannah’s case, like Michael Morton’s, proves that normal, everyday people can be victims of wrongful prosecution,” he said. “People who think that there is no way they could be charged—tomorrow—with a horrible crime are wrong.”
Supreme Commander of the Universe With Cape AND Tights AND Fancy Headgear
Supreme Commander of the Universe With Cape AND Tights AND Fancy Headgear

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum