Justice4Caylee.org
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Video from the hearing

Go down

Video from the hearing Empty Video from the hearing

Post by oviedo45 Wed Mar 25, 2009 8:58 pm

RAW VIDEO: Heated Conclusion In Casey Hearing
Video from the hearing 19010278_80X45
The situation got heated at the conclusion of the hearing in the case against Casey.



RAW VIDEO: Prosecution, Defense State Case
Video from the hearing 19009762_80X45
Casey Anthony appeared at a crucial hearing Wednesday morning. (03/25/09)



RAW VIDEO: Judge's Decision In Casey Hearing
Video from the hearing 19010236_80X45
Judge Stan Strickland made his decision Wednesday at a hearing in the case against Casey Anthony. (03/25/09)



The hearing was scheduled to discuss a possible conflict of interest and
whether the defense has any book or movie deals that could be
influencing the direction of the case. In the state's motion (read motion), it reads, her "seeming conversion from pauper to princess did not come from the sale of some tangible asset.

"Casey's attorney, Jose Baez, filed his response (read motion) as well as filed an affidavit from his client Casey Anthony (read Casey's response).

"It's come up, so I have to deal with it," Judge Stan Strickland said
Wednesday in court. "I'm going to make a couple of inquiries ... part
of this is just to protect your client.

"Attorney Jose Baez argued that any inquiries be made "in camera," a legal term for in private.

"I have to determine whether a conflict or not exists," the judge said.
"She can either waive the conflict or say she wants a new lawyer."

The judge then asked Baez to assert that it's true that nothing is be sold.

"The undersigned's Retainer Agreement does not contain any clauses allowing
him financial gain based on selling the rights to Ms. Casey Anthony's
story, nor are there any other instruments giving Defense counsel or
any third party the rights to Ms. Casey Anthony's story," Judge
Strickland quoted from Baez's motion.

Baez asserted his statements to the judge and denied any literary rights exist.

Judge Stickland then swore in Casey Anthony to discuss the affidavit that was
filed. She said all the items in her sworn affidavit are true.

Then, after a brief recession while the judge and attorneys met in private to discuss matter, the judge made his ruling.

"As far as I'm concerned, the matter has been resolved," Judge Strickland
said. "I'm convinced, as we sit here today, that no conflict exists. I
think we've covered the bases. The court is not going to issue an order
per se. this was just a motion to determine if a conflict existed.

"WFTV legal expert Bill Sheaffer said, several weeks ago, if Anthony's
attorney made a deal to sell her story then Casey could potentially use
that deal to appeal if she is convicted. Some prosecutors think it's
very possible Baez sold Casey's story to cover legal fees.

"She will say and do whatever it takes and have her attorneys do and say
whatever it takes for her to gain an acquittal in the case," Eyewitness
News legal expert Bill Sheaffer said.
oviedo45
oviedo45
Admin


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum