Casey Anthony's Linguistic Code Broken (Know When Casey Anthony Tells the Truth!) - Statement Analsis

Monday, June 06, 2011
Casey Anthony's Linguistic Code Broken (Know When Casey Anthony Tells the Truth!)

by Peter Hyatt

Each person has their own linguistic code. Statement Analysis seeks to "break" or enter into that code, and gain insight into truth or deception. In most cases, it is used to discern deception, but in the incessant deception of Casey Anthony, it is more useful to attempt to learn when, or if, she is telling the truth.

First, the internal code:

When a subject speaks, we must learn: does it come from the free editing process? This means that the subject is choosing her own words, freely, not reflecting back the language of the Interviewer. The words are chosen in less than a micro-second based upon patterns set in early childhood. This free editing process is highly reliable for learning what is truth and what is deceptive.

It helps us determine: does the language come from memory? If so, does it come from the subject's own memory? If so, does it come from the subject's own experiential memory, or did it come from the memory of a movie, book, or what someone else said?

It can get complex.

In the free editing process, lying is difficult and it is stressful. To avoid the internal stress of lying a person will most likely withhold information rather than lie. The percentage of lying by withholding rather than lying by creating a false reality is more than 90 percent. Fabrication of reality is rare, indeed.

This is why "I didn't do it" is so vital to Statement Analysis and it is something so incredibly simple that most investigators ignore it.

It is almost never said, in the free editing process, by guilty people, and it is almost always said, in the free editing process by innocent people, and it is (while in the free editing process) incredibly reliable.

More: http://seamusoriley.blogspot.com/2011/06/casey-anthonys-linguistic-code-broken_06.html