Casey Anthony Status Hearing: The Defense Sort Of Wins One! - T & T
Page 1 of 1
Casey Anthony Status Hearing: The Defense Sort Of Wins One! - T & T
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Casey Anthony Status Hearing: The Defense Sort Of Wins One!
Excerpt:
It wasn't a good day for the defense yesterday. They withdrew the second mental health expert, Dr. William Weitz, making most of the issues to be discussed moot.
They lost their opportunity to keep pictures from being introduced at the trial. They did have one objection that Judge Perry sustained. It was the objection to the smiling face of Casey taken just prior to her initial arrest on July 17, 2008. However, if the defense opens the door by asserting that when being interviewed by LE, she had been under the domination and control of the "big, bad, gun-toting detectives" we heard about when the defense tried to have all her interviews excluded. Then, the state can introduce the photograph to rebut the claims made. If this were to happen, I would imagine it would be during the cross-examination of Yuri Melich, John Allen, or Appy Wells.
Here's a brief explanation about the introduction of photographs into the trial. The state chose those photographs they would like to introduce as they interview the pertinent witnesses. Jose Baez objected to a few of them now, to exclude them from being used at trial. When Judge Perry denied the objection, it meant that the state could proffer them at the trial during the testimony of the witness.
READ MORE: http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2011/04/casey-anthony-status-hearing-defense.html
Casey Anthony Status Hearing: The Defense Sort Of Wins One!
Excerpt:
It wasn't a good day for the defense yesterday. They withdrew the second mental health expert, Dr. William Weitz, making most of the issues to be discussed moot.
They lost their opportunity to keep pictures from being introduced at the trial. They did have one objection that Judge Perry sustained. It was the objection to the smiling face of Casey taken just prior to her initial arrest on July 17, 2008. However, if the defense opens the door by asserting that when being interviewed by LE, she had been under the domination and control of the "big, bad, gun-toting detectives" we heard about when the defense tried to have all her interviews excluded. Then, the state can introduce the photograph to rebut the claims made. If this were to happen, I would imagine it would be during the cross-examination of Yuri Melich, John Allen, or Appy Wells.
Here's a brief explanation about the introduction of photographs into the trial. The state chose those photographs they would like to introduce as they interview the pertinent witnesses. Jose Baez objected to a few of them now, to exclude them from being used at trial. When Judge Perry denied the objection, it meant that the state could proffer them at the trial during the testimony of the witness.
READ MORE: http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/2011/04/casey-anthony-status-hearing-defense.html
mom_in_il- Supreme Commander of the Universe With Cape AND Tights AND Fancy Headgear
Similar topics
» Casey Anthony: Defense wins more money — and a warning
» Casey Anthony: Status Hearing Friday and Various Tidbits - T & T
» Casey Anthony: July 15 Status Hearing T & T
» Casey Anthony Status Hearing Monday - T & T
» A Casey Anthony Status/Pending Motions Hearing Set For Monday - cayleedaily
» Casey Anthony: Status Hearing Friday and Various Tidbits - T & T
» Casey Anthony: July 15 Status Hearing T & T
» Casey Anthony Status Hearing Monday - T & T
» A Casey Anthony Status/Pending Motions Hearing Set For Monday - cayleedaily
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|