Concerning the “Junk Science” Argument against Vass’s Work - Valhall

Concerning the “Junk Science” Argument against Vass’s Work

Posted on June 2nd, 2010 by Valhall

Excerpt:

Yesterday’s hearing was like a whole a lot of cold leftover stew with just a bit of meat remaining. The majority of the hearing can best be described using Judge Perry’s words…it was one attempt after another by the defense to get a “second bite of the apple” as they attempted to get motions previously ruled on by Judge Strickland ruled on again by Judge Perry. Unless I missed something by dosing off in between the bumbling and stuttering, I believe Judge Perry denied the motion for reconsideration on each of the motions heard.

So let’s get to what may have been the only meat in the matter, and that is the argument presented by Baez that is actually one of the first presentations toward the defense’s only strategy that has hope of making progress – the attack on the forensic science in the case. Baez argued for the Supplemental Motion to Compel filed by Lindy Kenny Baden on May 18th. This motion is one in a list of several Baden has filed attempting to get everything from funding sources to bench notes to CV’s and to infinity concerning ORNL (Oak Ridge Naitonal Laboratory) where Dr. Vass works, as well as the FBI laboratory. In this latest motion Ms. Baden included via references all the other previous motions she has filed with the long lists of information she wants.


READ MORE: http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/06/02/concerning-the-junk-science-argument-against-vasss-work/