Concerning the “Junk Science” Argument against Vass’s Work - Valhall

Concerning the “Junk Science” Argument against Vass’s Work

Posted on September 21st, 2010 by Valhall

Excerpt:

Considering the defense team has taken on a new mantra of junk science and Cheney Mason has blathered out some nonsensical statement that basically reduces to if you call it junk science then it is….I felt this needed to be re-ran.
________________________________

Original article posted on June 2, 2010

Yesterday’s hearing was like a whole a lot of cold leftover stew with just a bit of meat remaining. The majority of the hearing can best be described using Judge Perry’s words…it was one attempt after another by the defense to get a “second bite of the apple” as they attempted to get motions previously ruled on by Judge Strickland ruled on again by Judge Perry. Unless I missed something by dozing off in between the bumbling and stuttering, I believe Judge Perry denied the motion for reconsideration on each of the motions heard.

To be clear on what Ms. Baden is up to, this is, in fact, a phishing expedition. She is attempting to gather information on both of these institutes, where their money comes from, the people working there, and the processes employed connected with the Casey Anthony case to find any weak link she can exploit in court to cast doubt in the jurors’ minds about the veracity of the results coming from either or both sources. Her goal is to attack either with gusto or tenuous arguments, depending on what she can dig up in these phishing activities, any point she can make in front of the jury in order to make those jurors doubt, in some manner, the science being presented to them.

READ MORE: http://www.thehinkymeter.com/2010/09/21/concerning-the-junk-science-argument-against-vasss-work/