Defense Replies to States Respnses to DP Motions Filed

by mom_in_il Mon Jun 07, 2010 1:08 pm

06/04/2010			Reply Defendant's; to the State's Response to Defendant's Motion to Declare FS 921.141 Unconstitutional Due to it's Failure to Narrow the Scope of the Death Penalty
06/04/2010			Repl Defendant's; to the State's Response to Defendant's Motion to Declare FS 921.141(5)(L) Unconstitutional Facially and as Applied, and to Preclude it's Use in the Case at Bar
06/04/2010			Reply Defendant's; to the State's Response to Defendant's Motion to Declare FS 921.141(5)(D) and/or the FS 921.141(5)(D) Standard Instruction Unconstitutional Facially and as Applied and to Preclude Their Application at Bar
06/04/2010			Reply Defendant's; to the State's Response to Defendant's Motion to Declare FS 921.141(5)(I) Unconstitutional and to Preclude it's Use in the Present Case
06/04/2010			Reply Defendant's; to the State's Response to Defendant's Motion to Declare FS 921.141(5)(H) and/or the Standard (5)(H) Jury Instruction Unconstitutional Facially and as Applied
06/04/2010			Reply Defendant's; to the State's Response to Defendant's Motion to Declare FS 921.141(5)(M) Unconstitutional Facially and as Applied http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com Case No. 2008-CF-015606-A-O