Why Does Chloroform Concern Jose Baez? BS

http://bullstopper.wordpress.com/2011/01/13/why-does-chloroform-concern-jose-baez/
Why Does Chloroform Concern Jose Baez?

13
JAN
Casey Anthony’s defense attorney, Jose Baez, filed a sloppily undated motion presumably on December 30, 2010, requesting all evidence regarding chloroform or searches on the Anthony home computer for chloroform be banned from trial. The motion may be found at the following link.

http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Motion%20to%20Exclude%20-%20Chloroform%20%28Frye%29.pdf

“9. On December 11, 2009, while arguing against a defense motion, assistant state attorney Jeffrey Ashton gave a mock closing argument describing the States theory of their case while arguing in favor of the death penalty. Mr. Ashton knowing full and well that the above mentioned reports were false, carefully chose his words and DID NOT mention chloroform instead he argued that Caylee was either “physically or chemically restrained.” He continued to argue that if chemically restrained her killer prepared “SOME SUBSTANCE” in advance. Mr. Ashton had knowledge of all of the forensic evidence in the case never contributed to the fraud, but allowed the deception to continue.”

“while arguing against a defense motion” – Mr. Baez associates his claims of fraud with Mr. Ashton. Order is important. The most important aspect to Mr. Baez of Mr. Ashton’s involvement in alleged chloroform fraud is the fact Mr. Ashton opposed a motion favorable to Mr. Baez.